1)
What was the biggest surprise for you in the
reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different
from your expectations?
I really liked on page 138 the section about
eliminating muddling mindsets. Although I think it’s important to be able to
recognize design flaws and what not, if you focus on that too much it can
really hinder the bigger picture from happening.
2)
Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
I was
confused when the author said “things and people exist in the world in relation
to other things and people.” I honestly have no clue what this means.
3) If you were able to ask two questions
to the author, what would you ask? Why?
After reading this chapter, I would ask
the author which type of creativity (relationship, event, inner, spontaneous)
seems to be the most common that people practice? On that note, I would also
want to know which of these is most successful?
4)
Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
I really disagreed with table 5.2 in chapter 5. It specifies
differences between adaptors and innovators and says that Innovators questions
basic assumptions but I feel that the comments about adaptors are basic
assumptions. I thought this chart did point out some things that were correct
but overall was somewhat generalized.
No comments:
Post a Comment